Working With OSD
Practical guidance for vendors, agencies, and new team members — how to work inside this system without diluting it.
A brand bible is not a rulebook. It is a shared understanding — specific enough to create consistency, flexible enough to create great work.
Where to start — and why it matters
This is the last chapter of the Brand Bible because it addresses the people who will use everything that came before it. Vendors, social media agencies, photographers, copywriters, treatment coordinators starting their first week — all of them need to work from the same understanding of what OSD is and how it communicates. This chapter tells them how.
The Brand Bible is a living orientation document. It is not a creative brief for a single campaign. It is the standing brief — the framework inside which every brief, every piece of copy, every photograph, and every patient interaction should sit. Working inside this system does not constrain great work. It focuses it.
Reading guideWhich chapters to read first
Not everyone needs every chapter equally. The table below identifies the minimum reading by role. All chapters are relevant to all partners over time — but these are the ones to prioritise on day one.
| Role | Start here | Then read |
|---|---|---|
| Copywriter / content agency | Ch 01 Brand Story & Three Pillars Ch 05 Voice & Tone Ch 10 Compliance |
Ch 02 Positioning · Ch 04 Differentiators · Ch 06 SmileUp™ |
| Social media agency | Ch 05 Voice & Tone Ch 09 Channel Guide Ch 10 Compliance |
Ch 01 Brand Story · Ch 07 Visual Identity · Ch 08 Photography |
| Designer / creative studio | Ch 07 Visual Identity Ch 08 Photography & Aesthetics Ch 10 Compliance |
Ch 01 Brand Story · Ch 06 SmileUp™ · Ch 09 Channel Guide |
| Photographer / videographer | Ch 08 Photography & Aesthetics Ch 10 Compliance |
Ch 07 Visual Identity · Ch 01 Brand Story |
| New team member (clinical / ops) | Ch 01 Brand Story & Three Pillars Ch 03 The People Ch 05 Voice & Tone |
Ch 02 Positioning · Ch 06 SmileUp™ · Ch 10 Compliance |
| Treatment coordinator (TC) | Ch 02 Positioning & Strategy Ch 05 Voice & Tone Ch 06 SmileUp™ |
Ch 01 Brand Story · Ch 04 Differentiators · Ch 10 Compliance |
What needs CMO sign-off
OSD operates with a single marketing authority: the CMO. This is a deliberate choice. Brand consistency degrades when multiple people have final say on what goes out under the OSD name. The approval structure reflects that.
The distinction is not about trust. It is about the downstream cost of errors in patient-facing communications — a misworded claim, a compliant grey area, or an off-brand design choice that sets a precedent. These things compound. The approval process exists to catch them before they ship.
The six-question test
Before any piece of work leaves a vendor's hands — a draft copy document, a social post, a photograph selection, a designed asset — it should pass this test. These six questions represent the minimum bar for anything that carries the OSD name. They are not a creative checklist. They are a filter for the most common ways OSD work goes wrong.
Run through them in order. If any answer is wrong, revise before submitting. The CMO will ask the same questions on review.
-
1Is this HCSA-compliant? Confirm there are no before/after images, no comparative claims, no superlatives ("best," "leading"), no outcome testimonials, no fear-based language, and no pricing that could be read as inducement. If you are unsure about a specific claim, assume it needs review. Singapore's Healthcare Services Act 2020 regulations apply to all patient-facing content regardless of channel. Chapter 10 covers the prohibitions in full.
-
2Is this proof or promise? "We placed those veneers 15 years ago and they still look natural" is proof. "Our veneers will last a lifetime" is a promise. OSD communicates through documented reality — specific facts, verifiable credentials, observable outcomes. If the claim cannot be substantiated with a number, a date, a qualification, or a directly observable fact, it needs to be reframed or removed.
-
3Does this position through philosophy, not comparison? OSD does not say "unlike other practices" or "most dentists just focus on." It articulates its own values — the Three Pillars, the 19-year history, the teaching legacy — and trusts the right patient to recognise the difference. If the piece positions OSD by diminishing another approach or another provider, rewrite it. Position by stating what OSD believes; not by questioning what others do.
-
4Does this close an emotional gap, not just a knowledge gap? The patient OSD serves is not confused about dentistry. She is a senior professional making a considered decision about whether OSD is the right practice for her. The question she is asking is not "what is a veneer?" — it is "is this the right place for me?" Good OSD content answers that question through specificity, philosophy, and demonstrated mastery. If the piece reads like a technical explanation rather than a confidence-building communication, revisit the intent.
-
5Does this sound like The Atlantic or a dental brochure? Read the piece aloud. If it sounds enthusiastic, urgent, or credential-dense — if it uses exclamation marks, superlatives, or marketing clichés — it is in the wrong register. OSD writing is calm, precise, and editorially serious. It does not chase. It does not manufacture excitement. It puts the information there clearly and trusts the reader. If the tone is wrong, the content is wrong, regardless of what it says.
-
6Is this visual work consistent with the design system? For designed assets: confirm the colour palette (teal, coral, gold, cream), the typography (Noto Serif Display for headings ≥24px, Noto Sans for body and UI), the icon standard (flat SVG only — no emoji, no gradient icons), and the photography standard (shallow depth of field, warm tones, no before/after, no sterile clinical compositions) have been followed. Chapter 07 and Chapter 08 cover these in full. An asset that is visually inconsistent weakens every other asset around it.
Reading and referencing this document
The Brand Bible uses a simple version control convention. Every document in the system carries a version header in the format shown below. When referencing the Brand Bible in a brief or creative document, cite the version and date — this ensures everyone is working from the same edition and makes it straightforward to identify when a document was produced relative to any brand updates.
| Element | Format | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| v1.0 | Major version · Minor revision | Major version increments when substantive brand strategy changes — new positioning, revised compliance rules, significant visual identity updates. Minor revision increments for corrections, additions, and refinements that do not alter core strategy. |
| April 2026 | Month · Year | The month and year the current version was published. When the CMO issues an updated version, the date updates alongside the version number. Always check you are working from the current version before beginning a project. |
| Internal use only | Distribution classification | The Brand Bible is confidential. It may be shared with contracted vendors and agencies for the purpose of producing work for OSD, under the expectation of confidentiality. It is not for distribution beyond the working team without CMO approval. |
When a new version is issued, the CMO will notify all active vendors and team members. It is the responsibility of each party to ensure they are working from the current edition. Version discrepancies — working from an older Brand Bible — are one of the most common sources of brand drift, and the most avoidable.
A final noteThis document is the brief
Every campaign brief, content brief, or vendor engagement brief that comes out of OSD assumes this Brand Bible has been read. The specifics of a given campaign — objectives, deliverables, timelines, audience — will be covered in the brief itself. But the voice, the philosophy, the visual standards, the compliance framework: those are here. They do not get restated in every brief. They are assumed.
This means the Brand Bible is not a reference to consult once at the start of a relationship. It is a working document — something to return to when a piece of work feels slightly off, when a first draft is rejected without obvious reason, or when a new format is being attempted for the first time. Most creative problems, on examination, turn out to be brand problems. And most brand problems, on examination, are questions this document already answers.
If it does not — if you encounter a question this document does not address — bring it to the CMO. Unanswered questions get incorporated into future versions. This is how the document grows.
All content approvals, vendor briefs, brand questions
Day-to-day scheduling and operational comms
Front-of-house and patient communications